‘All the Hills and Vales Along’
All the hills and vales along
Earth is bursting into song,
And the singers are the chaps
Who are going to die perhaps.
O sing, marching men,
Till the valleys ring again.
Give your gladness to earth’s keeping,
So be glad, when you are sleeping.
Cast away regret and rue,
Think what you are marching to.
Little live, great pass.
Jesus Christ and Barabbas
Were found the same day.
This died, that went his way.
So sing with joyful breath,
For why, you are going to death.
Teeming earth will surely store
All the gladness that you pour.
Earth that never doubts nor fears,
Earth that knows of death, not tears,
Earth that bore with joyful ease
Hemlock for Socrates,
Earth that blossomed and was glad
‘Neath the cross that Christ had,
Shall rejoice and blossom too
When the bullet reaches you.
Wherefore, men marching
On the road to death, sing!
Pour your gladness on earth’s head,
So be merry, so be dead.
From the hills and valleys earth
Shouts back the sound of mirth,
Tramp of feet and lilt of song
Ringing all the road along.
All the music of their going,
Ringing swinging glad song-throwing,
Earth will echo still, when foot
Lies numb and voice mute.
On, marching men, on
To the gates of death with song.
Sow your gladness for earth’s reaping,
So you may be glad, though sleeping.
Strew your gladness on earth’s bed,
So be merry, so be dead.
This poem describes a group of soldiers who are marching off to battle, singing as they do so. They are watched— or perhaps more appropriately for this poem, heard— by the speaker as they move away.
STRUCTURE: ‘All the hills and vales along’ has a complex and intricately developed structure. Written in rhyming couplets, it comprises four stanzas each of which adds two lines to the first so that there are progressively eight lines, ten, twelve and finally fourteen. This, along with the repetition which is a feature of the poem, brings a cumulative effect whereby the ending has power and ‘weight’. The lengthening of the verse also mimics an interminable march where each set distance travelled seems longer and longer. Nonetheless, the poem is written in a jaunty, ‘tripping’, trochaic rhythm; a rhythm which contrasts ironically with the grim journey of the soldiers.
Charles Sorley: Charles Sorley was a talented and athletic student who gained a scholarship to study at one of Britain’s top public schools, Marlborough College. In 1913, at the age of 18, he moved to Germany for a year to study at the University of Jena before going up to Oxford University. War broke out in 1914, however, and Sorley was briefly interned by the German government before he was allowed to sail home to England. He promptly joined up and was made a captain in the Suffolk regiment. He arrived in France in May 1915— but was killed by a sniper at the Battle of Loos in October 1915, at only twenty years of age.
All the Hills and Vales along: Sorley did not title his poems; they were found rough-written in his backpack after he died at Loos. Poetic convention is to take the first line as title.
“All the hills and vales along / Earth is bursting into song”: The trochaic rhythm is evident: “ALL the HILLS and VALES aLONG / EARTH is BURSTing INto SONG”. This provides a tripping, upbeat rhythm that seems appropriate to the seemingly happy, pastoral description of the opening lines (compare Blake’s opening lines to Songs of Innocence and Experience: “Piping down the valleys wild / piping gentle songs of glee…”). The living “Earth” is a motif throughout the poem; there is an almost paganistic symbolism to this fertile imagery. The “bursting” of these opening lines speaks of spring, but also foreshadows the shells of the front that may kill the marching men.
“And the singers are the chaps / Who are going to die perhaps.”: the tone of the first two lines is immediately undercut by the fierce irony of these following. The colloquial tone of the third line seems to suggest a kind of Georgian jollity— but the almost offhand conclusion, that the soldiers may be about to die, makes us bleakly reconsider the seemingly romantic scene Sorely has described.
“O sing, marching men”: the form of Sorley’s poem, with verse and chorus, reflects and replies to the soldier’s marching song in a darker, more self-conscious tone.
“Give your gladness to earth’s keeping / So be glad when you are sleeping”: The listener seems to enjoy the men’s song, a moment of happiness in the short time of optimism and expectation given to them.
“Cast away regret and rue / Think what you are marching to.”: The beginning of the second stanza seems to exult in or at least enjoy the men’s happy fearlessness, as they march to war and possible heroism. Note the alliteration (r) that orders the beginning of the stanza.
“Little live, great pass. / Jesus Christ and Barabbas / Were found the same day.”: The reference is to the story of Christ and Barabbas. Arrested as Sorley speculates here on “the same day”, the Roman magistrate Pontius Pilate condemned both men to die as Jewish rebels. He gave the Jews of Jerusalem the chance, however, to release one from crucifixion: they chose to free Barabbas. Hence the “little” man lived, but the “great” man passed: “This died, that went his way”. Using this Christian imagery, Sorley seems to be suggesting that the greater man will lay down his life for his friends and country. It was a common metaphor to compare the sacrifice of soldiers to the sacrifice of Christ.
“So sing… you are going to death”: it is reiterated that death can be welcome— but this is nonetheless unsettling.
“Teeming earth will gladly store / All the gladness you can pour”: The earth ‘teems’— it is ‘full of life’. There seems to be a metaphorical equation here between life and gladness: understood abstractly, the lines seem to suggest a kind and infinitely comforting earth. If we literalise the metaphor, however— which means to make those abstract terms more realistic— the life that pours into the earth is blood: the blood of soldiers lying dead on the battlefield. This couplet is typical of the poem as a whole: superficially simple, even epigrammatic, but in fact deliberately ambiguous and ironic.
“Earth that…”: This phrase begins each line and is repeated rhetorically, in a technique known as anaphora. Anaphoraic rhetoric builds intensity with the accumulation of the same insistent phrase. Earth here becomes personified as a curiously unfeeling and amoral creature.
“…bore with joyful ease / Hemlock for Socrates…”: a classical allusion after the religious. Socrates (469-399 BC) is one of the most important Greek philosophers. He was forced by the state of Athens to take poison (the plant, hemlock) because his ideas supposedly corrupted the city’s youth, and were thus dangerous to the status quo. In this image, then, Earth seems to be boasting of producing the poison that killed one of Western culture’s great thinkers and original radicals.
“Earth that blossomed and was glad / ‘Neath the cross that Christ had,”: Earth again appears pitiless in this image. ‘Gladness’ might again here equate to blood— the blood that fell from Christ’s side after he was pierced by the centurion’s spear. The imagery of spring and blossoming recalls the Easter story, of Christ’s sacrifice for man on the cross.
“Earth… shall rejoice and blossom too / When the bullet reaches you”: an unconsoling thought, given the examples given prior.
“Wherefore, men marching… sing!”: there is a note of defiance in this exhortation. Note the continued alliteration, the rhythm of which is suitable for “men marching”.
“So be merry, so be dead.”: the pithy rhetorical tone continues with the use of anaphora; while this line also uses another common rhetorical / poetic device, antithesis, that is the opposition or contrast of ideas in parallel or balance within a sentence. This becomes a refrain that will end the poem.
“From the hills and valleys earth / Shouts back the sounds of mirth,”: the countryside echoes to the sound of the soldier’s happiness. Another classical reference may be contained here: the myth of Narcissus and Echo, the water-nymph forever condemned to only repeat the last words of her lover. The Earth here seems to reply to the soldiers who will soon be lying down with it, pouring gladness “on earth’s head”, a consummation that results in a bloody baptism or rebirth. Tragedy qualifies this happy image, especially as we are already aware of the ambiguous, ‘other’ nature of Earth’s relationship with men.
“All the music of their going”: another ironic statement: ‘their going’ speaks of the beginning of the soldier’s march, but also of their coming deaths.
“Earth will echo still, when foot / Lies numb and voice mute.”: the end of the last ‘verse’ in this stanza ends with silence (mute) and ultimate death— the singing is done.
“…on / to the gates of death with song”: the destination is stated clearly now. There is a classical clarity to the warrior’s journey at the end of the poem, but there remains a disturbing taint to the juxtaposition of death and life.
“Sow your gladness for earth’s reaping”: harvest imagery that promises a new spring. The poem’s vision of sacrifice is disturbing because it refuses a kind of moral transcendence; the men will die, and a new world will come of this, but only the fecund and ultimately silent earth is the recipient of their gift.
“Strew your gladness on earth’s bed, / So be merry, so be dead.” A final image of pagan fertility, where the ‘gladness’ that was blood now becomes definitively seminal. The final refrain captures the deeper antithesis running throughout the poem: that the living can celebrate death, and death inspire the living. Such a perspective is necessarily ironic.
[ANTHOLOGY NOTE: Sorley’s poem is neatly placed in the Anthology. Positioned just after poems which depict the feelings of exultation that accompanied the outbreak of war, it both reflects this celebratory tone and subtly subverts it. In many ways it is a similar poem to Hardy’s ‘Men Who March Away’, in that it presents the happiness of soldiers as they march off to fight: but like that poem the poet seems to take a more objective position than the earnestness shown by the soldiers. ‘All the Hills and Vales Along’ is a deliberately ambiguous and ironic poem in contrast to, say, Brooke’s sonnets, which are more romantic and straightforwardly patriotic. Sorley seems to take in the perspectives of both the early, enthused participants in the war, and the later, warier critique of poets like Owen and Sassoon. This poem also bears comparison to other WWI poems that describe singing or marching men: such as ‘The Men Who March Away’, Sassoon’s ‘Everyone Sang’, and Ivor Gurney’s ‘Strange Hells’. It also bears interesting comparison to poems that dwell on Nature and man’s relationship to nature, especially WWI poems that depict nature as pitiless or inhumanly other in some way. Sandburg’s ‘Grass’ (p.168), Steven’s ‘Death of a Soldier’ (p.169) and Owen’s ‘Futility’ (p.193) have some of this objective and alienated vision of Nature. Instead of finding comfort or pastoral beauty in nature, these poems suspect that man has been born into a world hostile to man and morality. These poems take the perspectives of paganism and inspect them in the light of modernity, and find consolation about the horrors of war hard to find as a consequence.]
13 thoughts on “All the Hills and Vales Along – Charles Sorley”
I don’t like the poem because of all the imperative verbs. “….sing…give..be glad…” I don’t know who Sorley thinks he is; you can’t force someone to die happily.
On one hand I agree with Monika because Sorley is in no place to be making up the minds of young boys who do not know the realities of war.
On the other hand this was a time, 1915, when Britain were losing the war and needed more support from home; and young lads would have a mind of doubt and would choose the easy way out by not joining or fighting in the war. So Sorley created this poem to establish that Britain still had a great hope of success. Sorley uses the imperative verbs to push away doubt in the soldiers head. He also uses imperative verbs to leave the soldier no options.
This poem makes more sense when you study it in an in-depth way; Sorley didn’t intend sounding like the bad guy, he was sounding like a person with powerful feelings for his Country!!
Yes, but this isn’t right. Sorley is being euphemistic throughout, trying to hide the terrors of war. It’s OK to convince someone, mentioning the possible consequences (like that a toddler may become fatherless and a wife may become a widow or that you might become disabled). But it’s wrong to force someone into believing that it’s worth it to die for your country.
I would say this isn’t one of my favourite poems. This may be because i have already heard many poems portraying the idea that it is right for one to die for your country and the image of the ‘men [who] marched away’ is used– and that is a title of a poem that has already been written by Thomas Hardy! Sorley however unlike Hardy doesnt write his poems so well- I feel that this poem rambles on a bit too much. Even though Sorley is saying that a man should die for his country, he isn’t presenting it well. It sounds more like negative poem, not something that would keep me upbeat during 1915.
I think your comment, Monika, that the poem uses imperative verbs is very interesting. The voice in this poem is an assertive one, and this can be alienating when reading poetry, I think. A commanding or assertive tone sometimes makes others want to switch off, especially if you don’t agree with the speaker.
You’re right to focus on this aspect of Sorley’s poem, though- it’s important in terms of the narrative voice. Sorley’s poem has an exhortatory tone, doesn’t it? It seems to urge the men on to action. This is what Toni seems to be keying into- this is another poem which seems to incite men to war.
As Toni says, though, this poem is more ‘negative’ or ambivalent than say, Brooke’s poetry or even Hardy’s ‘Men Who March Away’. It seems to recognise the dreadful consequences of that urging on to war in a way the other poems often don’t. Look how explicit Sorley is about the soldiers he writes about being shot!
Earth that blossomed and was glad
‘Neath the cross that Christ had,
Shall rejoice and blossom too
When the bullet reaches you.
Wherefore, men marching
On the road to death, sing!
I suppose the poem seems to me to be ambivalent about war and fighting: all the images of encouragement seem undercut by quite ugly images of death. So I guess I disagree with you, Monika, when you say this is a euphemistic poem- I personally think it’s quite a disturbing poem. Though I agree with you that it doesn’t seem to take an explicit moral stance on the war, and can see why some might see that as a problem. Perhaps the key is the assertive tone? This makes us question the viewpoint of the speaker, and perhaps Sorley wants us to do this. What I’m saying is that this may be an ironic, even at times sardonic poem. It may in fact be attacking just the kind of confident voice that it seems to use itself. What do you think?
Funnily enough, even though you opposed Monika’s opinion, I guess this also means I also disagree with you, Solomon! This isn’t the kind of poem that would convince me to fight, though you may feel differently. If I get you right, you see the poem as a more straightforwardly patriotic poem?
Ha ha ha!
Yes I do see it as patriotic and I will use a couple of quotes to unveil why:
1.’And the singers are the chaps / Who are going to die perhaps’ I believe what sorely is trying to say in the first line of the quote is that there is joy in fighting for your country, However, (when he goes into the second line) you do have to face the real facts which is you may die, But FOR YOUR COUNTRY!
I think sorely used hardy and Brooke’s style of writing however he unleashed Reality in his words; He doesn’t want to fool us.
2.’Give your gladness to earth’s keeping / So be glad when you are sleeping’ I actually think this is a clever verse! From reading this I imagine sorely saying to a crowd of British men:’give the joy of winning your battle to the soil that you fight on, so that when you die the soil that you gave gladness to is returning the favour.’
3. ‘Earth will echo still, when foot / Lies numb and voice mute’ This is an ambiguous quote. What I have come up with is that when you die is when you will get your respect.
4.’Little live, great pass. / Jesus Christ and Barabbas / Were found the same day’ I Believe Mr. Griffith has contradicted himself when he wrote a note on this quote via the last thing he said in his comment ‘This isn’t the kind of poem that would convince me to fight’!Ha ha ha!lool…People will want to sacrifice themselves for their country especially because of the religious text Sorely has used. People will want to receive the same respect that Jesus had when he sacrificed his life. Sorely is also saying that you will live to be nothing! if you don’t fight!
Some interesting thoughts, Solomon: I still disagree with you, but now I see why you think as you do. I think you’ve got some well evidenced points here! It is quite possible to read ‘All the Hills…’ as a patriotic poem.
For me at least, the poem’s preoccupation with death and the lack of consolation offered for that death undercuts its more conventional patriotic sentiments. I guess it’s the repeated line “So be merry, so be dead” that expresses this tension for me.
It’s nice to read your detailed commentary, though: it’s given me pause for thought!
I’ve got to disagree with some of the comments made on here. This to me, is an incredibly chilling poem, a parody even of Hardy’s Men who March Away. The dismissive way Sorley talks about death makes me think he is being purposely cynical, echoing the thoughts of military leaders of the time; that the young soldier’s deaths were not important.
The reference to Jesus and Barabbas seems patriotic but war is not inherently relgious, Jesus died on the cross to save humanity for their sins, these soldiers were going to commit murder on a mass scale, in some barbarian ways. It shows also the cruelty of the ways some British soldiers could die, or even be punished by their own commanders.
Personally, this poem seems to me to be more inherently chilling than Owen’s ‘Dulce et Decorum est’, especially the last line.
Thanks for the great analysis, I really enjoyed reading it.
I have to agree with grace here.
If you read more on Sorley’s background you would know that his wife was German and he was quoted saying this:
“England,I am sick of the sound of the word. In training to fight for that deliberate hypocrisy, that terrible middle-class sloth of outlook and appalling “imaginative indolence” that has marked us out from generation to generation.”
Because of this hatred of jingoism, he adopts this chilling ironic tone.
I perhaps haven’t thought this through thoroughly enough. (Bam, there’s some alliteration for you.) Could the poem have been written from a Christian standpoint as a weary acknowledgement of the ‘worldly’ world while looking ahead to eternal glory after death?
With his knowledge of the Christian story is it too much of a stretch to think that he was a Christian himself? It just strikes me that a man with a deep-rooted faith could display this attitude if he thought that he would be with Christ in death.
“Cast away regret and rue, think what you’re marching to.” i.e. heaven
“Give your gladness to Earth’s keeping, so be glad when you are sleeping” How can anyone experience anything in death unless death was not the end? You could be glad if you were going to be united with the Lord, surely.
I notice also that you didn’t touch on the line “till the valleys ring again”. Could this line be indicative of a belief in the second coming of Christ?
I just think it’s not necessarily pro-war or pro-patriotism, I think it might be about something on a higher level. The stuff about Jesus and Socrates not serving as a metaphor for human sacrifice but rather as previous examples of the ‘evil’ of men who now still seem not to have learned from past mistakes.
I think the general tone of the poem in Sorley’s head is this, “OK lads, the earth is pretty grim, what? Not just in war, but in general, and it’s not going to change any time soon. Don’t fear death, boys. It brings you to somewhere much better than this.”
Anyway, it’s just a thought. Just pursuing an angle that seems not to have been pursued here.
This is about as clearly an ironic anti-war poem as one can find. The notion that it contains any patriotic sentiment is absurd. The point of so much of it is the cosmic impartiality of at all; the religious content also has an ironic element. The brilliant line:’when the bullet reaches you’ is very typical of many of the War Poets, especially those who wrote later. Their aching need to reach out and seize the bright eyed civilian idealist by the throat is achingly obvious. This sentiment is very clear in other things Sorley wrote.
Fascinating insight through the comments above. Love the debate on this poem, particularly with James’ religious take on it. I personally find the irony and the futility in the subtext difficult to ignore, but the possible religious comfort aids the possibility that it is a genuine attempt at comfort/encouragement. One major problem which butts against this is the view of the earth: how does Soreley’s personified, cruel and unfeeling earth fit in to the comfort of marching towards heaven. Perhaps it is seen to lessen the Earth’s appeal so to improve the joy of heaven; I’m not sure otherwise.
Love the blog! Hope you’re still active.
I was just putting finishing touches on my assignment on War poetry when I stumbled upon your blog. The analysis and articles are really good, wish i had found it earlier.